A Momentary Flow

Updating Worldviews one World at a time

But What Would the End of Humanity Mean for Me? -Preeminent scientists are warning about serious threats to human life in the not-distant future, including climate change and superintelligent computers. Most people don’t care.  - Sometimes Stephen Hawking writes an article that both mentions Johnny Depp and strongly warns that computers are an imminent threat to humanity, and not many people really care. That is the day there is too much on the Internet. (Did the computers not want us to see it?) Hawking, along with MIT physics professor Max Tegmark, Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, and Berkeley computer science professor Stuart Russell ran a terrifying op-ed a couple weeks ago in The Huffington Post under the staid headline “Transcending Complacency on Superintelligent Machines.” It was loosely tied to the Depp sci-fi thriller Transcendence, so that’s what’s happening there. “It’s tempting to dismiss the notion of highly intelligent machines as mere science fiction,” they write. “But this would be a mistake, and potentially our worst mistake in history.” And then, probably because it somehow didn’t get much attention, the exact piece ran again last week in The Independent, which went a little further with the headline: “Transcendence Looks at the Implications of Artificial Intelligence—but Are We Taking A.I. Seriously Enough?” Ah, splendid. Provocative, engaging, not sensational. But really what these preeminent scientists go on to say is not not sensational. “An explosive transition is possible,” they continue, warning of a time when particles can be arranged in ways that perform more advanced computations than the human brain. “As Irving Good realized in 1965, machines with superhuman intelligence could repeatedly improve their design even further, triggering what Vernor Vinge called a ‘singularity.’” Get out of here. I have literally a hundred thousand things I am concerned about at this exact moment. Do I seriously need to add to that a singularity? (via But What Would the End of Humanity Mean for Me? - James Hamblin - The Atlantic)

But What Would the End of Humanity Mean for Me?
-
Preeminent scientists are warning about serious threats to human life in the not-distant future, including climate change and superintelligent computers. Most people don’t care.
-
Sometimes Stephen Hawking writes an article that both mentions Johnny Depp and strongly warns that computers are an imminent threat to humanity, and not many people really care. That is the day there is too much on the Internet. (Did the computers not want us to see it?) Hawking, along with MIT physics professor Max Tegmark, Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, and Berkeley computer science professor Stuart Russell ran a terrifying op-ed a couple weeks ago in The Huffington Post under the staid headline “Transcending Complacency on Superintelligent Machines.” It was loosely tied to the Depp sci-fi thriller Transcendence, so that’s what’s happening there. “It’s tempting to dismiss the notion of highly intelligent machines as mere science fiction,” they write. “But this would be a mistake, and potentially our worst mistake in history.” And then, probably because it somehow didn’t get much attention, the exact piece ran again last week in The Independent, which went a little further with the headline: “Transcendence Looks at the Implications of Artificial Intelligence—but Are We Taking A.I. Seriously Enough?” Ah, splendid. Provocative, engaging, not sensational. But really what these preeminent scientists go on to say is not not sensational. “An explosive transition is possible,” they continue, warning of a time when particles can be arranged in ways that perform more advanced computations than the human brain. “As Irving Good realized in 1965, machines with superhuman intelligence could repeatedly improve their design even further, triggering what Vernor Vinge called a ‘singularity.’” Get out of here. I have literally a hundred thousand things I am concerned about at this exact moment. Do I seriously need to add to that a singularity? (via But What Would the End of Humanity Mean for Me? - James Hamblin - The Atlantic)

Notes

  1. 990627 reblogged this from wildcat2030
  2. neurosengarten reblogged this from wildcat2030
  3. octoperson reblogged this from wildcat2030
  4. betweenthebridges reblogged this from wildcat2030
  5. theotter300 reblogged this from wildcat2030
  6. sidiox reblogged this from wildcat2030
  7. soundpropeller reblogged this from wildcat2030
  8. mahdanahmad reblogged this from wildcat2030
  9. crooked-rain reblogged this from wildcat2030
  10. lojar reblogged this from wildcat2030
  11. techmattersyes reblogged this from wildcat2030
  12. pay-no-attention-to-him reblogged this from wildcat2030
  13. bubblewrench reblogged this from wildcat2030
  14. brucewayneorsomebloke reblogged this from wildcat2030
  15. brochillies reblogged this from wildcat2030
  16. samburbury reblogged this from wildcat2030
  17. laikas-owner reblogged this from wildcat2030
  18. known2own reblogged this from wildcat2030
  19. milgevers reblogged this from wildcat2030
  20. laughswiththethunder reblogged this from wildcat2030
  21. selethaann reblogged this from wildcat2030
  22. thesecretartofbeingme reblogged this from wildcat2030