A Momentary Flow

Updating Worldviews one World at a time

The longevity gap -Costly new longevity drugs could help the wealthy live 120 years or more – but will everyone else die young? - The disparity between top earners and everyone else is staggering in nations such as the United States, where 10 per cent of people accounted for 80 per cent of income growth since 1975. The life you can pay for as one of the anointed looks nothing like the lot tossed to everyone else: living in a home you own on some upscale cul-de-sac with your hybrid car and organic, grass-fed food sure beats renting (and driving) wrecks and subsisting on processed junk from supermarket shelves. But there’s a related, looming inequity so brutal it could provoke violent class war: the growing gap between the longevity haves and have-nots. The life expectancy gap between the affluent and the poor and working class in the US, for instance, now clocks in at 12.2 years. College-educated white men can expect to live to age 80, while counterparts without a high-school diploma die by age 67. White women with a college degree have a life expectancy of nearly 84, compared with uneducated women, who live to 73. And these disparities are widening. The lives of white, female high-school dropouts are now five years shorter than those of previous generations of women without a high-school degree, while white men without a high-school diploma live three years fewer than their counterparts did 18 years ago, according to a 2012 study from Health Affairs. This is just a harbinger of things to come. What will happen when new scientific discoveries extend potential human lifespan and intensify these inequities on a more massive scale? It looks like the ultimate war between the haves and have-nots won’t be fought over the issue of money, per se, but over living to age 60 versus living to 120 or more. Will anyone just accept that the haves get two lives while the have-nots barely get one?
go read the rest..
(via Will the rich live to 120 and the poor die at 60? – Linda Marsa – Aeon)

The longevity gap
-
Costly new longevity drugs could help the wealthy live 120 years or more – but will everyone else die young?
-
The disparity between top earners and everyone else is staggering in nations such as the United States, where 10 per cent of people accounted for 80 per cent of income growth since 1975. The life you can pay for as one of the anointed looks nothing like the lot tossed to everyone else: living in a home you own on some upscale cul-de-sac with your hybrid car and organic, grass-fed food sure beats renting (and driving) wrecks and subsisting on processed junk from supermarket shelves. But there’s a related, looming inequity so brutal it could provoke violent class war: the growing gap between the longevity haves and have-nots. The life expectancy gap between the affluent and the poor and working class in the US, for instance, now clocks in at 12.2 years. College-educated white men can expect to live to age 80, while counterparts without a high-school diploma die by age 67. White women with a college degree have a life expectancy of nearly 84, compared with uneducated women, who live to 73. And these disparities are widening. The lives of white, female high-school dropouts are now five years shorter than those of previous generations of women without a high-school degree, while white men without a high-school diploma live three years fewer than their counterparts did 18 years ago, according to a 2012 study from Health Affairs. This is just a harbinger of things to come. What will happen when new scientific discoveries extend potential human lifespan and intensify these inequities on a more massive scale? It looks like the ultimate war between the haves and have-nots won’t be fought over the issue of money, per se, but over living to age 60 versus living to 120 or more. Will anyone just accept that the haves get two lives while the have-nots barely get one?

go read the rest..

(via Will the rich live to 120 and the poor die at 60? – Linda Marsa – Aeon)

Notes

  1. apptechmarissafeldman reblogged this from wildcat2030
  2. elemental-hero-stratos reblogged this from wildcat2030
  3. liliesofthevalleyoflies reblogged this from aliasott
  4. thefandomhoarder reblogged this from benot-may
  5. benot-may reblogged this from wildcat2030
  6. gearbooks reblogged this from buffleheadcabin and added:
    An even scarier question is what will happen to the world’s population with such drugs? We’re already set to hit 9...
  7. buffleheadcabin reblogged this from wildcat2030
  8. mattressestimesamillion reblogged this from bubblewrench
  9. xenostionlux reblogged this from wildcat2030
  10. markoberposts reblogged this from wildcat2030
  11. learnmore7 reblogged this from wildcat2030 and added:
    Dying old gracefully.
  12. bubblewrench reblogged this from wildcat2030
  13. the-flagless-empire reblogged this from wildcat2030 and added:
    this would be good news if one could confidently say that there were enough people meeting their potential where a...
  14. jatorres16 reblogged this from wildcat2030
  15. aliasott reblogged this from wildcat2030
  16. thedarkadonis reblogged this from wildcat2030
  17. techmattersyes reblogged this from wildcat2030
  18. codenamecosmos reblogged this from wildcat2030
  19. acrid-sentient reblogged this from wildcat2030
  20. stuffjonlikes reblogged this from wildcat2030
  21. afractalparticle reblogged this from wildcat2030
  22. bearwitheme reblogged this from wildcat2030